：“尽管和当前研究相比缺少细致的理论架构，但是早期关于战后组织的研究还

：“尽管和当前研究相比缺少细致的理论架构，但是早期关于战后组织的研究还是提出了许多与现代制度主义研究相似的看法。与当代对合作形式研究相同的是，1949年的一篇文章认为，多边主义在那些具有显著谈判优势以及可识别优势的双边行动中是受到排除的。早期的研究预示了后来在理论上成熟地区分正是与非正式协定的意义，早在1954年关于GATT的研究就承认，有些协定通过它们的非正式特性获得力量，那些有先见之明的机制研究文献认可了GATT‘在恰当的商业政策上把各种不同意见聚集到一起’的价值。”[3]虽然这些观点在当时屈指可数，并被淹没在现实主义的汪洋大海中，却无形中给未来的新自由主义的合作观指明了发展方向，即制度主义（国际组织的作用）、功能主义（一体化进程）和科层政治（国家行为主体多元化）分析。

Results (English) 1:

"While and rather than a lack of current research on theory architecture, but earlier studies on organizations after the war still presents many similarities with modern systems research point of view. And contemporary research on the form of cooperation is the same, 1949 article believes that multilateralism in those with significant negotiating leverage and to identify the advantages of bilateral operations are excluded. Early studies in theory foreshadowed later mature region is importance of informal agreements, acknowledged as early as 1954 study on GATT, some agreements gain strength through their informal character, those who had the foresight study on the mechanism of recognized GATT' in the literature on appropriate commercial policy bring different views together ' value. "[3], although these ideas were a handful and is submerged in the ocean of realism, a little abashed the next neo-liberal conception of cooperation indicates the direction system (the role of international organizations), functionalism (integration processes) and bureaucratic politics (State actors diversity).

Results (English) 2:

: "Although the current study compared to the lack of detailed theoretical framework, but early research on post-war organization or proposed many modern institutionalist research similar views and contemporary research on the same form of cooperation is that in 1949 an article. article that multilateralism bilateral action in those with significant negotiating leverage and identifiable advantage is being excluded. early studies indicate a later point what significance in theory and informal agreements mature regions, about as early as 1954 GATT's study acknowledged that some informal agreements through their properties to gain strength, those mechanisms Ming had the foresight research literature recognized GATT 'in the appropriate commercial policy to gather together a variety of different views' value. "[3] Although only a handful of these ideas at the time, and was drowned in a sea of ​​realism, but virtually outlook for future cooperation neoliberal direction of its development, namely institutionalism (the role of international organizations), functionalism ( (State actors diversification) analysis of the integration process) and bureaucratic politics.

Results (English) 3:

: "although and current research lacks the theoretical framework and meticulous, but early studies about post-war organization or put forward opinions and many similar studies of modern institutional. And the contemporary research on cooperative form is the same, a 1949 article that multilateralism is being excluded, in those with significant bargaining advantage and identifiable advantages of bilateral action. Early research indicates later mature in theory area is the significance and informal agreement, admitted in the early research on GATT in 1954, some protocols to gain strength through informal their characteristics,Research on the mechanism of those literature have prophetic vision recognition GATT 'in the appropriate business policy to a variety of different views together' value." [3] although these views at the time can be counted on one's fingers, and a vast expanse of water flooded in the realism, but virtually to the future of new liberalism cooperation view pointed out the direction of development, namely the institutionalism (the role of international organizations), functional (integration) and bureaucratic political (state behavior analysis of subject diversification).