死刑是一种以暴制暴的刑罚，二来并不能比终身监禁更有效的阻吓犯罪，三来应

死刑是一种以暴制暴的刑罚，二来并不能比终身监禁更有效的阻吓犯罪，三来应该让罪犯通过劳役回馈社会而不应处死。从“改变以暴制暴的观念”和“通过劳役回报社会赎罪”两个角度立论。反方则强调一来死刑不是以暴制暴，二来罪刑相当，三来马来西亚的伊斯兰教不同意西方的那种人权观念

Results (English) 1:

The death penalty is a kind of violence with violence penalties, not more effective crime deterrent than life imprisonment, three criminals through labour should be allowed to repay society and should not be executed. "Changing the concept of violence with violence" and "Atonement by labour and social returns" arguments two angles. Opposition officials stressed that the death penalty is not violence to violence and crime, to curb the Malaysia Islam does not agree with the Western concept of human rights

Results (English) 2:

The death penalty is a punishment to violence with violence, and secondly, and not more than life imprisonment to deter crime more effectively, three to be criminals and should not be put to death by the labor society. From "change attitudes to violence with violence" and "return to the community through servitude Atonement" argument two angles. Anti 方则强 transferred to the death penalty is not one to violence with violence, crime and secondly, quite, three to Islam Malaysia does not agree that the Western concept of human rights

Results (English) 3:

The death penalty is a punishment of violence with violence, more effective than life imprisonment and secondly does not deter crime, it should let criminals through labor to serve the society and should not be put to death. Change from the concept of violence "and" through two aspects of labor and social returns for argument. Opposition stressed way of the death penalty is not violence with violence, and secondly, the crime punishment, Sunline Malaysia Islam does not agree with that in the west the concept of human rights