不同于传统现实主义，新现实主义首先肯定国际合作在现实中合作是可能的，但

不同于传统现实主义，新现实主义首先肯定国际合作在现实中合作是可能的，但这种合作却是“难以实现，并且总是难以持久的，并且更多地可能是一种权宜之计”。同时，新现实主义认为国际社会的常态是冲突。米尔斯海默认为，两类因素制约了合作，即对相对收益的顾虑和欺诈的提防。[4]

Results (English) 1:

Different from traditional realism, neo-realism in reality first international cooperation cooperation is possible, but such cooperation is "difficult to achieve, and was always unsustainable, and could be more of a stop-gap measure." Meanwhile, new realism believes that the international community's norm is conflict. Mearsheimer believes that two factors constrain the cooperation, that is, over a relative benefit and frauds to watch out for. [4]

Results (English) 2:

Unlike traditional realism, neo-realism first affirmed international cooperation in reality cooperation is possible, but such cooperation is "difficult to achieve, and is always difficult to sustain, and more likely to be a stopgap measure." . Meanwhile, the new realism is considered the norm of the international community conflict. Mearsheimer believes that two types of factors restricting cooperation, namely the relative earnings concerns and beware of fraud. [4]

Results (English) 3:

Different from the traditional realism, new realism first affirmed the international cooperation in reality cooperation is possible, but this cooperation is "difficult to achieve, and always difficult to sustain, and more may be a matter of expediency". At the same time, the new realism holds that the international community were often conflict. Meaarsheimer think, two kinds of factors that cooperation, beware of the relative income concerns and fraud. [4]