新自由主义认为，随着世界各地的联系交往日益密切和相互依赖的不断加深，国

新自由主义认为，随着世界各地的联系交往日益密切和相互依赖的不断加深，国家间的利益日益呈现多元化、复杂化的趋势，安全问题尽管仍旧十分重要，但已绝非国家制定对外政策的首要目标。亨利•基辛格的思想深深扎根于古典现实主义传统，然而他也随着时代的发展而清楚地意识到：“国际问题的传统议程——大国均势、国家自身的安全——再也无法界定我们面临的威胁，也难以诠释未来的前景。我们正在进入新的时代。旧的国际格局正在崩溃，昔日的标语不再具有启示意义，过去的解决办法也不再奏效。在经济、传播和人类共有的期望面前，世界早已变得相互依赖了。”[9]因此，新自由主义认为国家是一个理性的行为体，都会将经济福利作为自身的优先目标，因此在经济层面上的国际合作将很容易开展起来。而这种“唯理性论”恰恰是新现实主义者所反对的，他们认为“公共选择的逻辑是，个人理性会导致集体的非理性，最终走向共同的悲剧”，因为“实际上，除非一个集团中的人数很少，或者除非存在强制或其他某些特殊手段以使个人按照他们的共同利益行事，有理性的、寻求自我利益的人个人不会采取行动以实现他们共同的或集团的利益。”[10]

Results (English) 1:

Neo-liberalism believes that along with contacts all over the world are increasing contacts and the deepening of interdependence, national interest the increasingly diverse and complex trends, security issues, while still important, but it is definitely not state the primary objective of formulating foreign policy. Henry Kissinger's thinking is deeply rooted in classical realism tradition, but he is also acutely aware of with the development of the times: "the traditional agenda of international issues--balance of power, the State's own security – can no longer define the threats we face, it is difficult to explain the future prospects. We are entering a new era. Old international structure is crumbling, and slogans of the past no longer has significance, solutions of the past are no longer working. In the face of economic, communication and common expectations, the world had become interdependent. "[9] so that neoliberal think States are rational actors, will have economic benefits as their priority, therefore international cooperation in economic terms could easily be carried out. And this "only rational on the" precisely is new realism who by against of, they think "public select of logic is, personal rational will led to collective of non-rational, eventually to common of tragedy", because "actually, unless a a group in the of number rarely, or unless exists forced or other some special means to makes personal according to they of common interests acting, has rational of, and sought self interests of people personal does not take action to achieved they common of or group of interests. "[10]

Results (English) 2:

Neo-liberalism that, with contact exchanges around the world increasingly close and deepening interdependence interests between nations increasingly diversified and complex trend, although still very important security issues, but has no means to develop the country's foreign policy The primary objective. • Henry Kissinger's thinking is deeply rooted in the classical realist tradition, but he also with the development of the times and clearly aware of: "traditional agenda of international issues - the balance of powers, the state's own security - can no longer define the threats we face, it is difficult to interpret prospects for the future and we are entering a new era. old international patterns are crumbling, the old slogan no longer have enlightenment, past solutions are no longer effective in the economic, communication and expectations before mankind, the world had become interdependent. "[9] Thus, neoliberalism that the state is a rational actor, will be economic benefits as its own priorities, the international cooperation on the economic level will be easily carried out. And this "the only rational theory" is precisely opposed the new realists, who believe that "public choice logic is that individual rationality will lead to collective irrationality, and ultimately to a common tragedy", because "In fact, unless a Group numbers rarely, or unless there is coercion or some other special means to enable individuals to act in accordance with their common interests, rational, self-interested people to seek personal interests do not take action to achieve their common or group . "[10]

Results (English) 3:

The new liberalism thought, with the world increasingly close contact interaction and interdependence between countries continues to deepen, the interests of the increasingly diversified, complicated trend, although still very important security problems, the primary goal but has not the national foreign policy. Henry thought of Kissinger is deeply rooted in the classical tradition of realism, but he also with the development of the times and clearly aware of: "international problems of traditional agenda -- the balance of the powers, the nation's own security -- cannot define the threat we face, it is difficult to interpret the future prospects. We are entering a new era.The old international pattern is collapsing, the former slogan no longer has the enlightenment significance, past solutions no longer work. In economy, communication and human common expectations before, already become interdependent world." [9] therefore, Neo liberalism that the state is a rational behavior body, will be economic welfare as the priority target itself, so the international cooperation in the economic level will be very easy to develop. But this kind of "rationality" theory is exactly a new realist opposed, they think "public choice logic is, individual rationality leads to collective irrationality, eventually lead to tragedy of the commons", because "in fact,Unless the number of a group of little, or unless there are mandatory or some other special means to enable individuals to act in accordance with their common interests, rational, seeking self interests person does not take action to achieve their common or the interests of the group." [10]