尽管新自由主义者同样认为世界政治中实现合作很困难，因为国际制度很虚弱，

尽管新自由主义者同样认为世界政治中实现合作很困难，因为国际制度很虚弱，国际社会不存在国内社会的标准，因此没有公共政府强制规则的实施。但新自由主义者却注意到国际机制这一因素在解决“无政府困境”时所发挥的积极作用。他们虽然承认无政府状态是世界政治的一种基本状态，但是这种状态并不意味着世界政治是缺少秩序的，更不意味着国际合作就是不可能的和不可靠的，相反在新自由主义者看来，无政府状态是一块“可培育的园地”（acultivable garden）：通过国际制度安排这种契约途径，能够实现国际和平。因此，世界政治的无政府状态不会是一成不变的，是可以走得出的一个困境。在《霸权之后》一书中，罗伯特•基欧汉正是通过严谨的论证分析，试图说明国际机制对于促进“无政府状态下的合作”是可能的，对减少世界政治经济中的纷争与不和是有价值的，对管理国际相互依赖是有意义的。[11]

Results (English) 1:

While the Liberals also believe that cooperation in world politics is difficult, because the international system was very weak, and there were no domestic social standards of the international community, there is no public enforcement of government rules. But Liberals noted that international mechanisms that factor in tackling "the predicament of anarchy," which play an active role. They although admitted no Government state is world political of a basic State, but this State does not means with world political is missing order of, more not means with international cooperation is impossible of and not reliable of, instead in new liberalism who seems, no Government state is a "can foster of garden" (acultivable garden): through international system arrangements this contract way, can achieved international peace. Therefore, political anarchy in the world won't be the same, can go out of a difficult situation. In his book after hegemony, luobote·JI Keohane is through rigorous analysis to show that international mechanisms for the promotion of "cooperation under anarchy," it is possible to reduce the global political and economic discord and disharmony and are valuable in, the management of international interdependence makes sense. [11]

Results (English) 2:

Although the neo-liberals also believe that the world is very difficult to achieve cooperation in politics, because the international system is very weak, the international community, there is no standard domestic society, so there is no public government enforce rules implemented. But neo-liberals have noted the positive role of this factor in solving international mechanism "Anarchy dilemma" is played. Although they admit is a basic state of anarchy in world politics, but this does not mean that the state is the lack of order in world politics, but that does not mean that international cooperation is impossible and unreliable, on the contrary in the neoliberal who seems, anarchy is a "can cultivate garden" (acultivable garden): This contract arrangements pathway through the international system, to achieve international peace. Therefore, the world political anarchy will not be static, is a dilemma can go drawn. In the "after hegemony," a book by Robert Keohane • It is through rigorous argumentation analysis attempts to explain international mechanisms for the promotion of "cooperation under anarchy" is possible, to reduce the world's political and economic strife and discord in the valuable for the management of international interdependence is meaningful. [11]

Results (English) 3:

Although also think the new liberal cooperation is very difficult to achieve in world politics, because the international system is very weak, the domestic social standards do not exist in international society, so there is no implementation of public government mandatory rules. But the new liberal noticed this factor in international mechanism to solve the "positive role played by the government when no difficulties". Although they acknowledge that anarchy is a basic condition of world politics, but this does not mean that world politics is the lack of order, but does not mean that international cooperation is not possible and unreliable, contrary to the Neo liberalists,Anarchy is a piece of "cultivate garden" (acultivable garden): this contract arrangement way through international institutions, to achieve international peace. Therefore, the world political anarchy is not immutable and frozen, is a dilemma can go out of the. In "after hegemony" in one book, Robert Keohane is through rigorous demonstration analysis, trying to explain international mechanisms for the promotion of "cooperation under Anarchy" is possible, there is value to reduce disputes and discord in the world political economy, the management of international interdependence is meaningful. [11]