同樣法律不同案情‧死刑未必彰顯公義 牛津大學犯罪學教授羅傑霍德指出，大

同樣法律不同案情‧死刑未必彰顯公義
牛津大學犯罪學教授羅傑霍德指出，大馬在2012年針對1千535人進行的民意調查顯示，在正常情況下，有91%的受訪者認為殺人犯該被處死、超過80%受訪者認為毒販該被處死，及83%受訪者贊成軍火罪犯該被處死。
以上的民意調查後來加入了其他因素如：婦女多年被丈夫虐待，忍無可忍下謀殺丈夫；少年為雇主帶行李箱過關時被搜出毒品等。然後再讓民眾表態。
結果，贊成殺人犯被處死的受訪者猛跌至14%、贊成處死毒販和軍火罪犯的只有30%。
由此可見，世事不如我們想像得那麼簡單直接，同樣一套法律運用在不同案情中，未必就能彰顯公義，也不是每個殺人犯或毒販都是罪該萬死的。
此外，只有32%的人認同，死刑是出於它的阻嚇作用，47%的人是出於報復心態。
從人權角度出發的人則認為，所有生命理應獲得尊重及保障，加上數據一再顯示死刑缺乏有力的阻嚇作用，犯罪率依然有增無減，所以更不應該以法律之名褫奪性命，而是以積極、正面的手法讓犯人在監獄中懺悔並改過自新。
加迪傑蘇案沉冤得雪
林志偉也舉出了70年代的加迪傑蘇案（Karthigesu case），來說明死刑有多危險。這是一宗謀殺案，被告原本被判了死刑，但後來因證據不足而翻案才沉冤得雪，逃過鬼門關。
“萬一誤判，國家就背背負了殺人兇手的罪名，人民也不能置身事外，畢竟是人民贊同保留這個刑法的。”
“在共和聯邦國家中，就只有大馬和新加坡堅持保留死刑。不過拿督斯里納茲里已經倡議廢除死刑，這是好的開始，希望政府能早日落實有關建議。”

明吉：以牙還牙製造更多悲劇
監禁更能反省改過
法理之外有人情。尤其是強調慈悲的佛教。
大馬佛教總會副主席明吉法師認為，死刑是不人道的，也解決不了問題。他說，冤冤相報，以牙還牙，會製造更多悲劇。
“人非聖賢，誰能無過？佛教提倡慈悲，我們都會犯錯，如果就這樣結束了一個人的生命，他哪有機會反省自己的行為，改過自新？”
他說，很多被判死刑的販毒都只是一時糊塗，社會學會原諒之餘，也必須要有同理心。
“倘若犯人是自己的至親，相信你也不忍心看著他們的生命被強制結束。與其製造喪親之痛，倒不如給生命第二次機會。”
明吉法師也指出，懲罰有很多種方法，但不能用死刑，反而監禁更能達到改邪歸正的效果。監禁雖然剝奪了他們的自由，但牢獄之苦卻可讓他們反省過錯。

Results (English) 1:

Same law, Chief merits the death penalty may not be very effective 顯 can correspond Oxford big school crime School Professor Rome 傑 David pointed out that, big Macedonia in 2012 針 Yes 1535 people progress line of public opinion Zambia check 顯 shows, in normal love overview Xia, has 91% of by visit who 認 because 殺 committed this was finish died, and Super over 80% by visit who 認 because HIV 販 this was finish died, and the 83% by visit who 贊 into final fire criminals this was finish died. More probe investigation comes after public opinion joined by other factors, such as: women abused by her husband for years, cannot endure 謀 殺 husband why employers brought suitcases over the very time young was seized drugs. Then again let the people he table Phase.Used fruit, 贊 殺 commits is finish dead by visitors tumbled to 14%, 贊 finish dead drug dealers and criminals only 30% final fire. See, things are not as good as we think directly description that lists, in the same set of laws also set in use in different circumstances, unlikely to Zhang 顯 義, not every individual 殺 committed crimes or drug dealers is this Nations died. In addition, only 32% get in, fit in, Xia deterrent effect of the death penalty was out of it, 47% who is out for Revenge Phase. Promote people copyright angle out release of people entering into 認 because, all life acting Ying 獲 have respect and the guarantees, plus number high speed circuit switched data repeatedly 顯 shows death penalty lack powerful of resistance Xia role, crime still has increased cannot reduce, so more not Ying this to legal of name strip duo lives, but to equivalent of 極, and positive of technique let prisoners in Jian 獄 in the 懺 regrets does modified over rehabilitation. Jadi 傑 Suai have cases redressed the snow Lin 偉 ju 70, Jadi 傑 Suai (Karthigesu case), then explain how dangerous is the death penalty. This is a case of 謀 殺, the defendant had been sentenced to death, but later due to insufficient securities for high speed circuit switched data in the future, at least until I have redressed, fled over the ghost door activities."萬 誤 outsourcing country backs 負 殺 one murderer guilty people can't stay, after all people 贊 retained this discourse of criminal law. ”"In the Republican United States in the country, just the Happy Valley race course and Singapore 堅 retained the death penalty. Not over Datuk Seri Varna Moritz've advocated Council FA with the exception of the death penalty, this is a good start, I hope the Government will soon fall right about building Council. ” Meikichi: teeth tooth still manufacture more tragic Opera Bastille Jian ban can reflect change over Legal there is human. Zambia especially strong compassion of Buddhism.Happy Valley why Buddhism always want normal University 認 Meikichi law, Vice-President, the death penalty is inhumane, and solutions not encountered problems. He said injustice injustice furnished accommodation, with the teeth still, want to manufacture more tragic Opera Bastille."Without San Xian, who can't over? Buddhism advocates mercy, we'll make a wrong, if this model courses used to beam up a person's life, which airport he'll reflect on your Behavior, change over rehabilitation? ”He said, many sentenced 販 poison paste coating is just a time, General and theoretical'll rest on the original 諒, also must have empathy. "If prisoners are to Qing, believes their life, and you don't want to see him be compellingly used to beam. Stub its manufacture sang Qing's pain, it would be better to fast Club Med to second life. ”Ming ji Normal University also pointed out that 懲 罰 have many kind of way, but not the death penalty, but evil GUI Jian more Prada to ban modified positive effect. Jian although a: Duo-ban their freedom, but prison 獄 suffered but can catch their reflection over the wrong.

Results (English) 2:

Also different is not necessarily demonstrate the merits of the death penalty law ‧ justice
criminology professor at Oxford University, Roger Hodder noted that polls Malaysia in 2012 for 535 thousand people showed that under normal circumstances, 91 percent of respondents believe that murder The guilty were executed, more than 80% of respondents believe that drug traffickers were executed, and 83 percent of respondents were in favor of arms that criminals were executed.
More polls later joined the other factors such as: women abused by her husband for many years, under intolerable murder of her husband; are seized with a suitcase teenager for employers to pass drugs. And then let people stand.
As a result, the murderer was executed in favor of the respondents plummeted to 14%, in favor of drug traffickers and arms offenders executed only 30%.
Thus, the world is not as good as we thought was so simple and straightforward, using the same set of laws in different circumstances of the case, may not be able to highlight justice, not every murderer or drug traffickers are Zuigaiwansi.
In addition, only 32% of people agree that the death penalty is a deterrent for it, 47% of people are out for revenge.
From a human rights perspective of people think that all life should be respected and guaranteed, plus a lack of data have repeatedly shown strong deterrent effect of the death penalty, the crime rate is still increasing, so more should not be deprived of life in the name of the law, and It is a positive, positive way to let the prisoners to repent and rehabilitation in prison.
Jadi Ravin case get any redress
Lin Zhiwei also cited the case of Gaddi Ravin (Karthigesu case) 70 years to illustrate how dangerous the death penalty. This is a murder case, the defendant was originally sentenced to death, but later because of insufficient evidence and the verdict was Chen Yuan was the snow, escaped the jaws of death.
"If false, the state would back the charges carry a murderer, the people can not stay out, after all, the people in favor of retaining the criminal law." "In the Commonwealth countries, only Malaysia and Singapore insisted on retaining the death penalty. But Datuk Sri Nazri initiatives already abolished the death penalty, which is a good start, I hope the Government will soon implement the recommendations. " Mindzhevan: eye for an eye make more tragedies reflect better rehabilitation imprisonment humane than legal. With particular emphasis on compassion in Buddhism. Malaysian Buddhist Association Vice-Mindzhevan Master believes that the death penalty is inhumane, but also solve the problem. He said, retribution, tooth for tooth, will create more tragedy. "People are not saints, who without it? Buddhism advocates mercy, we all make mistakes, so if you end up with a person's life, his chance to reflect on how their behavior, rehabilitation?" He said that many were sentenced to death for drug trafficking just a moment of weakness, I learned to forgive the society, but also must have empathy. "If the prisoners of their own loved ones, I believe you bear to see their lives were forced to end. Bereavement its manufacture, it is better to give life a second chance." Mindzhevan Master also pointed out that there are many ways to punish, but they can not use the death penalty, but the effect of imprisonment can be better achieved repented. While imprisoned deprived of their freedom, but pain prison but allows them to reflect on mistakes.

Results (English) 3:

同樣法律不同案情‧死刑未必彰顯公義牛津大學犯罪學教授羅傑霍德指出, 大馬在 2012 年針對 1 千 535 人進行的民意調查顯示, 在正常情況下, 有 91% 的受訪者認為殺人犯該被處死、超過 80% 受訪者認為毒販該被處死, 及 83% 受訪者贊成軍火罪犯該被處死.以上的民意調查後來加入了其他因素如: 婦女多年被丈夫虐待, 忍無可忍下謀殺丈夫; 少年為雇主帶行李箱過關時被搜出毒品等. 然後再讓民眾表態.結果, 贊成殺人犯被處死的受訪者猛跌至 14% 、贊成處死毒販和軍火罪犯的只有 30%.由此可見, 世事不如我們想像得那麼簡單直接, 同樣一套法律運用在不同案情中, 未必就能彰顯公義, 也不是每個殺人犯或毒販都是罪該萬死的.此外, 只有 32% 的人認同, 死刑是出於它的阻嚇作用, 47% 的人是出於報復心態.從人權角度出發的人則認為, 所有生命理應獲得尊重及保障, 加上數據一再顯示死刑缺乏有力的阻嚇作用, 犯罪率依然有增無減, 所以更不應該以法律之名褫奪性命, 而是以積極、正面的手法讓犯人在監獄中懺悔並改過自新.加迪傑蘇案沉冤得雪林志偉也舉出了 70 年代的加迪傑蘇案 (картигесу дело), 來說明死刑有多危險. 這是一宗謀殺案, 被告原本被判了死刑, 但後來因證據不足而翻案才沉冤得雪, 逃過鬼門關."萬一誤判, 國家就背背負了殺人兇手的罪名, 人民也不能置身事外, 畢竟是人民贊同保留這個刑法的"."在共和聯邦國家中, 就只有大馬和新加坡堅持保留死刑. 不過拿督斯里納茲里已經倡議廢除死刑, 這是好的開始, 希望政府能早日落實有關建議".明吉: 以牙還牙製造更多悲劇監禁更能反省改過法理之外有人情. 尤其是強調慈悲的佛教.大馬佛教總會副主席明吉法師認為, 死刑是不人道的, 也解決不了問題. 他說, 冤冤相報, 以牙還牙, 會製造更多悲劇."人非聖賢, 誰能無過? 佛教提倡慈悲, 我們都會犯錯, 如果就這樣結束了一個人的生命, 他哪有機會反省自己的行為, 改過自新?"他說, 很多被判死刑的販毒都只是一時糊塗, 社會學會原諒之餘, 也必須要有同理心."倘若犯人是自己的至親, 相信你也不忍心看著他們的生命被強制結束. 與其製造喪親之痛, 倒不如給生命第二次機會".明吉法師也指出, 懲罰有很多種方法, 但不能用死刑, 反而監禁更能達到改邪歸正的效果. 監禁雖然剝奪了他們的自由, 但牢獄之苦卻可讓他們反省過錯.