新现实主义认为，由于国际社会的无政府状态，使得国家身处于一个“自助体系

新现实主义认为，由于国际社会的无政府状态，使得国家身处于一个“自助体系”中，因此，“生存是国家的首要目标”几乎成了新现实主义者的一致观点[7]。特别是在核武器时代，更使得人类社会深深处于生存的忧虑之中。但是新现实主义者同时也承认，国家同时也追求非安全目标，但当安全与财富两个目标相冲突时，前者却要终于后者。而恰恰是在这一点上，古典自由主义的开山鼻祖亚当•斯密似乎也和新现实主义的观点不谋而合：“防御比财富重要得多。”[8]

Results (English) 1:

Neo-realism believes that because of the anarchy of the international community, and nation in a "self-service system", therefore, "survival is the primary objective of the country" almost unanimously by the new realists point [7]. Especially in the nuclear age, makes deep fear for survival of human society. But the new realists also acknowledged that State while also pursuing non-security objectives, but two objectives come into conflict when security and wealth, but finally the former to the latter. But at this point, classical liberalism founder Adam Smith also seems to view and new realism: "defense is far more important than wealth. "[8]

Results (English) 2:

New realism that because anarchy of the international community, making the country was in a "self-help system," and therefore, "survival is the primary goal of the country's" new realists become almost unanimous view of [7]. Especially in the nuclear age, but also makes human society is deeply worried about the survival of being. But the new realists also admitted that the country is also pursuing non-security goals, but the two goals of wealth and security in conflict, the former have to finally latter. And it is precisely at this point, the classical liberal pedigree • Adam Smith and the new realism seems to have views coincide:. "Is much more important than wealth defense" [8]

Results (English) 3:

New realism believes that, because of anarchy of the international community, making the state in a "self-help system", therefore, "survival is the primary goal of the national [7] consensus" almost became the new realist. Especially in the nuclear age, more make the human society deeply in the survival anxiety. But the new realists also admitted, but also the pursuit of non national security objectives, but when the safety and wealth two goals conflict, the former to the latter is finally. But it is precisely at this point, the classical liberalism of Adam Smith also appears to be the first person to do sth. agree without prior without previous consultation and new realistic view:"The defense far more important than wealth." [8]